Comments on: MUPhotoView 1.0 http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/ If I could put reflection under this header, I would. Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:30:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: blake http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/#comment-13611 blake Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:26:29 +0000 http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/#comment-13611 MUPhotoView can bind to anything that's an array of images - so if you bind to a tree controller, each of your nodes should have a member that has an array of images. That's the easiest way, but without knowing more, that's about all I can say... MUPhotoView can bind to anything that’s an array of images - so if you bind to a tree controller, each of your nodes should have a member that has an array of images. That’s the easiest way, but without knowing more, that’s about all I can say…

]]> By: Jason Terhorst http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/#comment-13555 Jason Terhorst Mon, 02 Oct 2006 01:39:12 +0000 http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/#comment-13555 Would you have any idea on how I could connect MUPhotoView to an NSTreeController via bindings? I already have an NSOutlineView connected to the controller, but I'd like to use the photoview with it as well. However, I don't know how to properly connect it, so that it would show all of the parents and their child objects in the proper order (I've heard that arrangedObjects doesn't always work as expected). Would you have any idea on how I could connect MUPhotoView to an NSTreeController via bindings? I already have an NSOutlineView connected to the controller, but I’d like to use the photoview with it as well. However, I don’t know how to properly connect it, so that it would show all of the parents and their child objects in the proper order (I’ve heard that arrangedObjects doesn’t always work as expected).

]]> By: Red Sweater Links » Blog Archive » MUPhotoView 1.0 http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/#comment-1248 Red Sweater Links » Blog Archive » MUPhotoView 1.0 Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:38:04 +0000 http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/#comment-1248 [...] Blake Seely has released an open source (attribution) licensed NSView subclass suitable for filling the “iPhoto-style matrix of photos” void. This type of UI, or something very close to it, seems to be the source for a large number of questions on the mailing lists. Hopefully this code will help lots of people get a good head start. Thanks, Blake! Link. [...] [...] Blake Seely has released an open source (attribution) licensed NSView subclass suitable for filling the “iPhoto-style matrix of photos” void. This type of UI, or something very close to it, seems to be the source for a large number of questions on the mailing lists. Hopefully this code will help lots of people get a good head start. Thanks, Blake! Link. [...]

]]> By: blake http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/#comment-925 blake Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:07:14 +0000 http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/#comment-925 Dale: unfortunately, I can't do that with my current hosting provider, so no, I can't do that right now, as much as I'd like to. If I find some time, I'll look into putting it on SourceForge, but I would rather host it on a personal site if possible. Daniel: I'll definitely do that. (And yes, it's basically an attribution license right now) Dale: unfortunately, I can’t do that with my current hosting provider, so no, I can’t do that right now, as much as I’d like to. If I find some time, I’ll look into putting it on SourceForge, but I would rather host it on a personal site if possible.

Daniel: I’ll definitely do that. (And yes, it’s basically an attribution license right now)

]]> By: Daniel Jalkut http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/#comment-920 Daniel Jalkut Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:39:26 +0000 http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/#comment-920 Awesome! Could you also clarify the license terms? I found something in the comments of a source file that make it sound basically like an attribution license, but it would probably comfort lots of folks to have it clearly spelled out what constitutes acceptable attribution. Also, I suggest putting a separate LICENSE file in there since its conventional and makes it really obvious for somebody looking. Awesome! Could you also clarify the license terms? I found something in the comments of a source file that make it sound basically like an attribution license, but it would probably comfort lots of folks to have it clearly spelled out what constitutes acceptable attribution. Also, I suggest putting a separate LICENSE file in there since its conventional and makes it really obvious for somebody looking.

]]> By: Dale http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/#comment-919 Dale Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:16:01 +0000 http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/17/muphotoview-10/#comment-919 Thanks a lot for releasing that! Are you thinking of making a public svn repository for that code? Thanks a lot for releasing that! Are you thinking of making a public svn repository for that code?

]]>