<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Please. No.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2007/05/11/please-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2007/05/11/please-no/</link>
	<description>If I could put reflection under this header, I would.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MBA Revisited. at blakeseely.com</title>
		<link>http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2007/05/11/please-no/#comment-74788</link>
		<dc:creator>MBA Revisited. at blakeseely.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2007/05/11/please-no/#comment-74788</guid>
		<description>[...] posted earlier on my general thoughts about MBAs here. But I saw this FSJ post today and made the mistake of following the links and actually reading [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted earlier on my general thoughts about MBAs here. But I saw this FSJ post today and made the mistake of following the links and actually reading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jussi Hagman</title>
		<link>http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2007/05/11/please-no/#comment-67606</link>
		<dc:creator>Jussi Hagman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 22:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2007/05/11/please-no/#comment-67606</guid>
		<description>I too agree with the post. 

The common wisdom is following: if you are good in programming, you become programmer, if you're good musically you become musician, etc. BUT if you aren't good in anything you go and work in management :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too agree with the post. </p>
<p>The common wisdom is following: if you are good in programming, you become programmer, if you&#8217;re good musically you become musician, etc. BUT if you aren&#8217;t good in anything you go and work in management <img src='http://blakeseely.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hanson</title>
		<link>http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2007/05/11/please-no/#comment-67368</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 18:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2007/05/11/please-no/#comment-67368</guid>
		<description>Amen to that!  Back when I ran my consulting company, I read "Harvard Business Review."  Mostly for laughs.  It astounded me to no end that there wasn't much of any substance in it - no mathematical modeling, no rigorous statistical analysis, nothing of the sort.  Just fluff.

I do know some decent MBAs (at Apple, no less) but they'd be just as decent without the initials.  Far scarier are the type represented in the article, the "I'm in an MBA program and I want to work for ___!" folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that!  Back when I ran my consulting company, I read &#8220;Harvard Business Review.&#8221;  Mostly for laughs.  It astounded me to no end that there wasn&#8217;t much of any substance in it - no mathematical modeling, no rigorous statistical analysis, nothing of the sort.  Just fluff.</p>
<p>I do know some decent MBAs (at Apple, no less) but they&#8217;d be just as decent without the initials.  Far scarier are the type represented in the article, the &#8220;I&#8217;m in an MBA program and I want to work for ___!&#8221; folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
